activity
20192022
most citedWhylSon: Proving your Michelson Smart Contracts in Why3

6 citations · 9 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.LO20221 cited

Leroy and Blazy were right: their memory model soundness proof is automatable (Extended Version)

Pedro Barroso, Mário Pereira, António Ravara

Xavier Leroy and Sandrine Blazy in 2007 conducted a formal verification, using the Coq proof assistant, of a memory model for low-level imperative languages such as C. Considering…

cs.LO2021

Cameleer: a Deductive Verification Tool for OCaml (extended version)

Mário Pereira, António Ravara

OCaml is particularly well-fitted for formal verification. On one hand, it is a multi-paradigm language with a well-defined semantics, allowing one to write clean, concise, type-sa…

cs.PL2020

CISE3: Verifying Weakly Consistent Applications with Why3

Filipe Meirim, Mário Pereira, Carla Ferreira

In this paper we present a tool for the formal analysis of applications built on top of replicated databases, where data integrity can be at stake. To address this issue, one can i…

cs.PL20206 cited

WhylSon: Proving your Michelson Smart Contracts in Why3

Luís Pedro Arrojado da Horta, João Santos Reis, Mário Pereira +1

This paper introduces WhylSon, a deductive verification tool for smart contracts written in Michelson, which is the low-level language of the Tezos blockchain. WhylSon accepts a fo…

cs.LO2020

Animated Logic: Correct Functional Conversion to Conjunctive Normal Form

Pedro Barroso, Mário Pereira, António Ravara

We present an approach to obtain formally verified implementations of classical Computational Logic algorithms. We choose the Why3 platform because it allows to implement functions…

cs.LO20192 cited

Desfuncionalizar para Provar

Mário Pereira

This paper explores the idea of using defunctionalization as a proof technique for higher-order programs. Defunctionalization builds on substituting functional values by a first-or…