activity
20102026
most citedAutomatic Fact-Checking Using Context and Discourse Information

30 citations · 96 across the 31 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

30 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

A Reality Check of Inference-Time Context Augmentation Methods

Haeun Yu, Geert Heyman, Pepa Atanasova +1

Large language models (LLMs) often fail to utilise the context given in the input, resulting in hallucinations or a fallback to parametric knowledge. Context augmentation methods a…

cs.CL2026

Explaining the Roles of Experts in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Personalization

Sekh Mainul Islam, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Personalization of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly important for user-centric applications, yet prior methods mainly adapt dense LLMs, whose polysemantic neurons, each…

cs.CL2026

Claim Framing as a Driver of LLM Sycophancy

Jean Seo, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Sycophancy in Large Language Models, the tendency to align responses with user preferences over ground truth, has largely been studied using questions without a clear ground truth…

cs.CL2026

From Concept Alignment to Causal Grounding: An Intervention Test of Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness

Qianli Wang, Yilong Wang, Dennis Wei +5

Chain-of-thought (CoT) can sound plausible yet be unfaithful to the model's underlying reasoning. Most prior work probes CoT faithfulness through input--output behavior or input at…

cs.CL2026

Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization

Jingyi Sun, Qianli Wang, Pepa Atanasova +2

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) faithfulness, i.e., whether CoTs genuinely reflect large language models' (LLM) underlying behavior, is typically evaluated with metrics under two disjoint p…

cs.CL2026

Can Large Language Models Still Explain Themselves? Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Self-Explanations

Qianli Wang, Nils Feldhus, Pepa Atanasova +4

Quantization is widely used to accelerate inference and streamline the deployment of large language models (LLMs), yet its effects on self-explanations (SEs) remain unexplored. SEs…

cs.CL2025

Multi-Step Knowledge Interaction Analysis via Rank-2 Subspace Disentanglement

Sekh Mainul Islam, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Natural Language Explanations (NLEs) describe how Large Language Models (LLMs) make decisions by drawing on external Context Knowledge (CK) and Parametric Knowledge (PK). Understan…

cs.CL2025

Evaluation Framework for Highlight Explanations of Context Utilisation in Language Models

Jingyi Sun, Pepa Atanasova, Sagnik Ray Choudhury +2

Context utilisation, the ability of Language Models (LMs) to incorporate relevant information from the provided context when generating responses, remains largely opaque to users,…

cs.CL2025

Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanations

Yingming Wang, Pepa Atanasova

With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), Natural Language Explanations (NLEs) have become increasingly important for understanding model predictions. However, th…

cs.CL2024

A Reality Check on Context Utilisation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Lovisa Hagström, Sara Vera Marjanović, Haeun Yu +5

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) helps address the limitations of parametric knowledge embedded within a language model (LM). In real world settings, retrieved information can…

cs.CL2024

Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation Framework

Shuzhou Yuan, Jingyi Sun, Ran Zhang +4

Natural language explanations (NLEs) are commonly used to provide plausible free-text explanations of a model's reasoning about its predictions. However, recent work has questioned…

cs.CL2024

DYNAMICQA: Tracing Internal Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models

Sara Vera Marjanović, Haeun Yu, Pepa Atanasova +3

Knowledge-intensive language understanding tasks require Language Models (LMs) to integrate relevant context, mitigating their inherent weaknesses, such as incomplete or outdated k…

cs.CL2024

Evaluating Input Feature Explanations through a Unified Diagnostic Evaluation Framework

Jingyi Sun, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Explaining the decision-making process of machine learning models is crucial for ensuring their reliability and transparency for end users. One popular explanation form highlights…

cs.CL2024

Revealing the Parametric Knowledge of Language Models: A Unified Framework for Attribution Methods

Haeun Yu, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Language Models (LMs) acquire parametric knowledge from their training process, embedding it within their weights. The increasing scalability of LMs, however, poses significant cha…

cs.CL2023

Explaining Interactions Between Text Spans

Sagnik Ray Choudhury, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Reasoning over spans of tokens from different parts of the input is essential for natural language understanding (NLU) tasks such as fact-checking (FC), machine reading comprehensi…

cs.CL2023

Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations

Pepa Atanasova, Oana-Maria Camburu, Christina Lioma +3

Explanations of neural models aim to reveal a model's decision-making process for its predictions. However, recent work shows that current methods giving explanations such as salie…

cs.CL2023

bgGLUE: A Bulgarian General Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark

Momchil Hardalov, Pepa Atanasova, Todor Mihaylov +7

We present bgGLUE(Bulgarian General Language Understanding Evaluation), a benchmark for evaluating language models on Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks in Bulgarian. Our b…

cs.CL2022

Fact Checking with Insufficient Evidence

Pepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma +1

Automating the fact checking (FC) process relies on information obtained from external sources. In this work, we posit that it is crucial for FC models to make veracity predictions…

cs.CL2021

Generating Fluent Fact Checking Explanations with Unsupervised Post-Editing

Shailza Jolly, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein

Fact-checking systems have become important tools to verify fake and misguiding news. These systems become more trustworthy when human-readable explanations accompany the veracity…

cs.CL2020★ 1 cited

A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification

Pepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma +1

Recent developments in machine learning have introduced models that approach human performance at the cost of increased architectural complexity. Efforts to make the rationales beh…

cs.CL2020

Generating Label Cohesive and Well-Formed Adversarial Claims

Pepa Atanasova, Dustin Wright, Isabelle Augenstein

Adversarial attacks reveal important vulnerabilities and flaws of trained models. One potent type of attack are universal adversarial triggers, which are individual n-grams that, w…

cs.CL2020

Multi-Hop Fact Checking of Political Claims

Wojciech Ostrowski, Arnav Arora, Pepa Atanasova +1

Recent work has proposed multi-hop models and datasets for studying complex natural language reasoning. One notable task requiring multi-hop reasoning is fact checking, where a set…

cs.CL2020★ 16 cited

SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)

Marcos Zampieri, Preslav Nakov, Sara Rosenthal +6

We present the results and main findings of SemEval-2020 Task 12 on Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020). The task involves three subtas…

cs.CL2020

Generating Fact Checking Explanations

Pepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma +1

Most existing work on automated fact checking is concerned with predicting the veracity of claims based on metadata, social network spread, language used in claims, and, more recen…