activity
20182026
most citedFine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences

112 citations · 146 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

15 papers

cs.MA2026

Emergent Misaligned Communication in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent LLM Commerce

Zeyuan Li, Lukas Petersson, Alessandro Acquisti +1

Frontier LLM agents increasingly transact on behalf of separate principals, often using natural language rather than structured APIs. Much of the safety literature studies misalign…

cs.AI2025

Benchmarking Overton Pluralism in LLMs

Elinor Poole-Dayan, Jiayi Wu, Taylor Sorensen +2

We introduce OVERTONBENCH, a novel framework for measuring Overton pluralism in LLMs--the extent to which diverse viewpoints are represented in model outputs. We (i) formalize Over…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Can AI Truly Represent Your Voice in Deliberations? A Comprehensive Study of Large-Scale Opinion Aggregation with LLMs

Shenzhe Zhu, Shu Yang, Michiel A. Bakker +2

Large-scale public deliberations generate thousands of free-form contributions that must be synthesized into representative and neutral summaries for policy use. While LLMs have be…

cs.AI2025

RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment

Xiaoyang Cao, Zelai Xu, Mo Guang +4

Standard human preference-based alignment methods, such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), are a cornerstone for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human…

cs.CY2025★ 2 cited

Scaling Human Judgment in Community Notes with LLMs

Haiwen Li, Soham De, Manon Revel +6

This paper argues for a new paradigm for Community Notes in the LLM era: an open ecosystem where both humans and LLMs can write notes, and the decision of which notes are helpful e…

cs.SI2024

Supernotes: Driving Consensus in Crowd-Sourced Fact-Checking

Soham De, Michiel A. Bakker, Jay Baxter +1

X's Community Notes, a crowd-sourced fact-checking system, allows users to annotate potentially misleading posts. Notes rated as helpful by a diverse set of users are prominently d…

cs.CY2024★ 3 cited

Democratic AI is Possible. The Democracy Levels Framework Shows How It Might Work

Aviv Ovadya, Kyle Redman, Luke Thorburn +11

This position paper argues that effectively "democratizing AI" requires democratic governance and alignment of AI, and that this is particularly valuable for decisions with systemi…

cs.LG2022★ 112 cited

Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences

Michiel A. Bakker, Martin J. Chadwick, Hannah R. Sheahan +8

Recent work in large language modeling (LLMs) has used fine-tuning to align outputs with the preferences of a prototypical user. This work assumes that human preferences are static…

cs.LG2021★ 1 cited

Statistical discrimination in learning agents

Edgar A. Duéñez-Guzmán, Kevin R. McKee, Yiran Mao +9

Undesired bias afflicts both human and algorithmic decision making, and may be especially prevalent when information processing trade-offs incentivize the use of heuristics. One pr…

cs.MA2021

Modelling Cooperation in Network Games with Spatio-Temporal Complexity

Michiel A. Bakker, Richard Everett, Laura Weidinger +4

The real world is awash with multi-agent problems that require collective action by self-interested agents, from the routing of packets across a computer network to the management…

cs.LG2019★ 1 cited

DADI: Dynamic Discovery of Fair Information with Adversarial Reinforcement Learning

Michiel A. Bakker, Duy Patrick Tu, Humberto Riverón Valdés +4

We introduce a framework for dynamic adversarial discovery of information (DADI), motivated by a scenario where information (a feature set) is used by third parties with unknown ob…

cs.LG2019★ 12 cited

Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detection

Madelon Hulsebos, Kevin Hu, Michiel Bakker +5

Correctly detecting the semantic type of data columns is crucial for data science tasks such as automated data cleaning, schema matching, and data discovery. Existing data preparat…

cs.HC2019★ 3 cited

VizNet: Towards A Large-Scale Visualization Learning and Benchmarking Repository

Kevin Hu, Neil Gaikwad, Michiel Bakker +7

Researchers currently rely on ad hoc datasets to train automated visualization tools and evaluate the effectiveness of visualization designs. These exemplars often lack the charact…

cs.CY2018

Active Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making

Alejandro Noriega-Campero, Michiel A. Bakker, Bernardo Garcia-Bulle +1

Society increasingly relies on machine learning models for automated decision making. Yet, efficiency gains from automation have come paired with concern for algorithmic discrimina…

cs.HC2018★ 11 cited

VizML: A Machine Learning Approach to Visualization Recommendation

Kevin Z. Hu, Michiel A. Bakker, Stephen Li +2

Data visualization should be accessible for all analysts with data, not just the few with technical expertise. Visualization recommender systems aim to lower the barrier to explori…