most citedIs Free Choice Permission Admissible in Classical Deontic Logic?

2 citations · 3 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI20221 cited

Modelling and Explaining Legal Case-based Reasoners through Classifiers

Xinghan Liu, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo +1

This paper brings together two lines of research: factor-based models of case-based reasoning (CBR) and the logical specification of classifiers. Logical approaches to classifiers…

cs.AI2022

Deontic Meta-Rules

Francesco Olivieri, Guido Governatori, Matteo Cristani +2

The use of meta-rules in logic, i.e., rules whose content includes other rules, has recently gained attention in the setting of non-monotonic reasoning: a first logical formalisati…

cs.LO2022

Avoiding Pragmatic Oddity: A Bottom-up Defeasible Deontic Logic

Guido Governatori, Silvano Colombo Tosatto, Antonino Rotolo

This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem. The logic applies three general principles: (1) the Pragmatic Oddity problem…

cs.LO20192 cited

Is Free Choice Permission Admissible in Classical Deontic Logic?

Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo

In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations. As is w…

cs.AI2019

Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains

Maximiliano C. D. Budán, María Laura Cobo, Diego I. Martínez +1

In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal dom…