activity
20192026
most citedLEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain

48 citations · 121 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

cs.CL2026

Synthetic Pre-pretraining Survives Scale, but Not as a Grammatical Prior

Atsuki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Inaba, Joel Niklaus +3

Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic non-natural language data improves token efficiency during language model pre-training (PT). Prior work attributes this gain to a grammatical pri…

cs.CL2026

How Can We Synthesize High-Quality Pretraining Data? A Systematic Study of Prompt Design, Generator Model, and Source Data

Joel Niklaus, Atsuki Yamaguchi, Michal Štefánik +9

Synthetic data is a standard component in training large language models, yet systematic comparisons across design dimensions, including rephrasing strategy, generator model, and s…

cs.CL2025

Parity-Aware Byte-Pair Encoding: Improving Cross-lingual Fairness in Tokenization

Negar Foroutan, Clara Meister, Debjit Paul +4

Tokenization is the first -- and often least scrutinized -- step of most NLP pipelines. Standard algorithms for learning tokenizers rely on frequency-based objectives, which favor…

cs.CL2025

LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams

Yu Fan, Jingwei Ni, Jakob Merane +14

Long-form legal reasoning remains a key challenge for large language models (LLMs) in spite of recent advances in test-time scaling. To address this, we introduce LEXam, a novel be…

cs.CL2025

SwiLTra-Bench: The Swiss Legal Translation Benchmark

Joel Niklaus, Jakob Merane, Luka Nenadic +16

In Switzerland legal translation is uniquely important due to the country's four official languages and requirements for multilingual legal documentation. However, this process tra…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledge

Angelika Romanou, Negar Foroutan, Anna Sotnikova +56

The performance differential of large language models (LLM) between languages hinders their effective deployment in many regions, inhibiting the potential economic and societal val…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

From Citations to Criticality: Predicting Legal Decision Influence in the Multilingual Swiss Jurisprudence

Ronja Stern, Ken Kawamura, Matthias Stürmer +2

Many court systems are overwhelmed all over the world, leading to huge backlogs of pending cases. Effective triage systems, like those in emergency rooms, could ensure proper prior…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Unlocking Legal Knowledge: A Multilingual Dataset for Judicial Summarization in Switzerland

Luca Rolshoven, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Srinanda Brügger Bose +4

Legal research depends on headnotes: concise summaries that help lawyers quickly identify relevant cases. Yet, many court decisions lack them due to the high cost of manual annotat…

cs.CL2024

LawInstruct: A Resource for Studying Language Model Adaptation to the Legal Domain

Joel Niklaus, Lucia Zheng, Arya D. McCarthy +7

Instruction tuning is an important step in making language models useful for direct user interaction. However, the legal domain is underrepresented in typical instruction datasets…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Towards Explainability and Fairness in Swiss Judgement Prediction: Benchmarking on a Multilingual Dataset

Santosh T. Y. S. S, Nina Baumgartner, Matthias Stürmer +2

The assessment of explainability in Legal Judgement Prediction (LJP) systems is of paramount importance in building trustworthy and transparent systems, particularly considering th…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

LegalLens: Leveraging LLMs for Legal Violation Identification in Unstructured Text

Dor Bernsohn, Gil Semo, Yaron Vazana +5

In this study, we focus on two main tasks, the first for detecting legal violations within unstructured textual data, and the second for associating these violations with potential…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

Automatic Anonymization of Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rulings

Joel Niklaus, Robin Mamié, Matthias Stürmer +2

Releasing court decisions to the public relies on proper anonymization to protect all involved parties, where necessary. The Swiss Federal Supreme Court relies on an existing syste…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

Resolving Legalese: A Multilingual Exploration of Negation Scope Resolution in Legal Documents

Ramona Christen, Anastassia Shaitarova, Matthias Stürmer +1

Resolving the scope of a negation within a sentence is a challenging NLP task. The complexity of legal texts and the lack of annotated in-domain negation corpora pose challenges fo…

cs.CL2023★ 28 cited

LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models

Neel Guha, Julian Nyarko, Daniel E. Ho +37

The advent of large language models (LLMs) and their adoption by the legal community has given rise to the question: what types of legal reasoning can LLMs perform? To enable great…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

Anonymity at Risk? Assessing Re-Identification Capabilities of Large Language Models

Alex Nyffenegger, Matthias Stürmer, Joel Niklaus

Anonymity of both natural and legal persons in court rulings is a critical aspect of privacy protection in the European Union and Switzerland. With the advent of LLMs, concerns abo…

cs.CL2023★ 7 cited

One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support

Ronja Stern, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Veton Matoshi +5

Recent strides in Large Language Models (LLMs) have saturated many Natural Language Processing (NLP) benchmarks, emphasizing the need for more challenging ones to properly assess L…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

MultiLegalPile: A 689GB Multilingual Legal Corpus

Joel Niklaus, Veton Matoshi, Matthias Stürmer +2

Large, high-quality datasets are crucial for training Large Language Models (LLMs). However, so far, there are few datasets available for specialized critical domains such as law a…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

MultiLegalSBD: A Multilingual Legal Sentence Boundary Detection Dataset

Tobias Brugger, Matthias Stürmer, Joel Niklaus

Sentence Boundary Detection (SBD) is one of the foundational building blocks of Natural Language Processing (NLP), with incorrectly split sentences heavily influencing the output q…

cs.CL2023★ 48 cited

LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain

Joel Niklaus, Veton Matoshi, Pooja Rani +3

Lately, propelled by the phenomenal advances around the transformer architecture, the legal NLP field has enjoyed spectacular growth. To measure progress, well curated and challeng…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

BudgetLongformer: Can we Cheaply Pretrain a SotA Legal Language Model From Scratch?

Joel Niklaus, Daniele Giofré

Pretrained transformer models have achieved state-of-the-art results in many tasks and benchmarks recently. Many state-of-the-art Language Models (LMs), however, do not scale well…

cs.CL2022

ClassActionPrediction: A Challenging Benchmark for Legal Judgment Prediction of Class Action Cases in the US

Gil Semo, Dor Bernsohn, Ben Hagag +2

The research field of Legal Natural Language Processing (NLP) has been very active recently, with Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) becoming one of the most extensively studied tasks…

cs.CL2022★ 7 cited

An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction

Joel Niklaus, Matthias Stürmer, Ilias Chalkidis

Cross-lingual transfer learning has proven useful in a variety of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, but it is understudied in the context of legal NLP, and not at all in Leg…

cs.CL2021★ 1 cited

Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark

Joel Niklaus, Ilias Chalkidis, Matthias Stürmer

In many jurisdictions, the excessive workload of courts leads to high delays. Suitable predictive AI models can assist legal professionals in their work, and thus enhance and speed…

cs.AI2019

Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Card Games and Its Application to the Swiss Game Jass

Joel Niklaus, Michele Alberti, Vinaychandran Pondenkandath +2

In the last decades we have witnessed the success of applications of Artificial Intelligence to playing games. In this work we address the challenging field of games with hidden in…