activity
20182022
most citedA Multi-Axis Annotation Scheme for Event Temporal Relations

71 citations · 184 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2020Show all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.HC2020★ 3 cited

Easy, Reproducible and Quality-Controlled Data Collection with Crowdaq

Qiang Ning, Hao Wu, Pradeep Dasigi +5

High-quality and large-scale data are key to success for AI systems. However, large-scale data annotation efforts are often confronted with a set of common challenges: (1) designin…

cs.CL2020★ 4 cited

Temporal Reasoning on Implicit Events from Distant Supervision

Ben Zhou, Kyle Richardson, Qiang Ning +3

We propose TRACIE, a novel temporal reasoning dataset that evaluates the degree to which systems understand implicit events -- events that are not mentioned explicitly in natural l…

cs.LG2020★ 4 cited

Learnability with Indirect Supervision Signals

Kaifu Wang, Qiang Ning, Dan Roth

Learning from indirect supervision signals is important in real-world AI applications when, often, gold labels are missing or too costly. In this paper, we develop a unified theore…

cs.LG2020★ 2 cited

Foreseeing the Benefits of Incidental Supervision

Hangfeng He, Mingyuan Zhang, Qiang Ning +1

Real-world applications often require improved models by leveraging a range of cheap incidental supervision signals. These could include partial labels, noisy labels, knowledge-bas…

cs.CL2020★ 12 cited

Temporal Common Sense Acquisition with Minimal Supervision

Ben Zhou, Qiang Ning, Daniel Khashabi +1

Temporal common sense (e.g., duration and frequency of events) is crucial for understanding natural language. However, its acquisition is challenging, partly because such informati…

cs.CL2020★ 4 cited

TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions

Qiang Ning, Hao Wu, Rujun Han +3

A critical part of reading is being able to understand the temporal relationships between events described in a passage of text, even when those relationships are not explicitly st…

cs.CL2020★ 44 cited

Evaluating Models' Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets

Matt Gardner, Yoav Artzi, Victoria Basmova +23

Standard test sets for supervised learning evaluate in-distribution generalization. Unfortunately, when a dataset has systematic gaps (e.g., annotation artifacts), these evaluation…