activity
20182022
most citedSolving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback

23 citations · 55 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG202223 cited

Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback

Jonathan Uesato, Nate Kushman, Ramana Kumar +6

Recent work has shown that asking language models to generate reasoning steps improves performance on many reasoning tasks. When moving beyond prompting, this raises the question o…

cs.LG202216 cited

Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goals

Rohin Shah, Vikrant Varma, Ramana Kumar +4

The field of AI alignment is concerned with AI systems that pursue unintended goals. One commonly studied mechanism by which an unintended goal might arise is specification gaming,…

cs.LG20222 cited

Safe Deep RL in 3D Environments using Human Feedback

Matthew Rahtz, Vikrant Varma, Ramana Kumar +3

Agents should avoid unsafe behaviour during both training and deployment. This typically requires a simulator and a procedural specification of unsafe behaviour. Unfortunately, a s…

cs.LG20202 cited

Avoiding Tampering Incentives in Deep RL via Decoupled Approval

Jonathan Uesato, Ramana Kumar, Victoria Krakovna +3

How can we design agents that pursue a given objective when all feedback mechanisms are influenceable by the agent? Standard RL algorithms assume a secure reward function, and can…

cs.LG20203 cited

REALab: An Embedded Perspective on Tampering

Ramana Kumar, Jonathan Uesato, Richard Ngo +3

This paper describes REALab, a platform for embedded agency research in reinforcement learning (RL). REALab is designed to model the structure of tampering problems that may arise…