most citedA Richly Annotated Corpus for Different Tasks in Automated Fact-Checking

2 citations · 3 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL20192 cited

A Richly Annotated Corpus for Different Tasks in Automated Fact-Checking

Andreas Hanselowski, Christian Stab, Claudia Schulz +2

Automated fact-checking based on machine learning is a promising approach to identify false information distributed on the web. In order to achieve satisfactory performance, machin…

cs.CL20191 cited

Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddings

Nils Reimers, Benjamin Schiller, Tilman Beck +3

We experiment with two recent contextualized word embedding methods (ELMo and BERT) in the context of open-domain argument search. For the first time, we show how to leverage the p…

cs.CL2019

Fine-Grained Argument Unit Recognition and Classification

Dietrich Trautmann, Johannes Daxenberger, Christian Stab +2

Prior work has commonly defined argument retrieval from heterogeneous document collections as a sentence-level classification task. Consequently, argument retrieval suffers both fr…

cs.CL2018

Cross-lingual Argumentation Mining: Machine Translation (and a bit of Projection) is All You Need!

Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, Christian Stab +1

Argumentation mining (AM) requires the identification of complex discourse structures and has lately been applied with success monolingually. In this work, we show that the existin…

cs.CL2018

Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources Using Attention-based Neural Networks

Christian Stab, Tristan Miller, Iryna Gurevych

Argument mining is a core technology for automating argument search in large document collections. Despite its usefulness for this task, most current approaches to argument mining…