collaborators

11 papers

quant-ph2026

The statistical disturbance bound of quantum measurements

Ties-A. Ohst, Sebastian Schlösser, Roope Uola

Quantifying the disturbance caused by a quantum measurement typically requires detailed knowledge of the underlying measurement channel. In this work, we introduce a statistical di…

quant-ph2026

Quantifying randomness with measurement incompatibility

Sebastian Schlösser, Pauli Jokinen, Martin Plávala +3

We present a trade-off between the amount of observed measurement incompatibility and the capabilities of a classical Eavesdropper in a prepare-and-measure scenario. The result is…

quant-ph2026

Simulating quantum measurements without superposition devices

Gabriele Cobucci, Alexander Bernal, Roope Uola +1

Superposition is the core feature that sets quantum theory apart from classical physics. Here, we investigate whether sets of quantum measurements can be modelled by using only dev…

quant-ph2026

Certification of the genuine resolution of photon number resolving detectors

Jef Pauwels, Towsif Taher, Roope Uola +3

Photon-number-resolving (PNR) detectors are essential components of photonic quantum technologies, yet thus far, no practical metric exists to certify how many photons they can gen…

quant-ph2026

High-Dimensional Quantum Photonics: Roadmap

Mehul Malik, Micheal Kues, Takuya Ikuta +30

The field of high-dimensional quantum photonics involves the use of multimode photonic degrees-of-freedom such as the spatial, temporal, or spectral structure of light to encode mu…

quant-ph2026

Can every set of incompatible measurements lead to genuine multipartite steering?

Lucas E. A. Porto, Lucas Tendick, Daniel Cavalcanti +2

Measurement incompatibility and bipartite quantum steering are known to display a strong connection: a set of measurements is incompatible if and only if it can lead to bipartite s…