29 citations · 67 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
(Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code
Hamza Khalid, Ronald E. Thompson, Alejandra Sabater +3
AI coding assistants are rapidly transforming software development, but are known to produce insecure code. Prior work has measured whether AI-assisted developers produce secure co…
Bug Hunters' Perspectives on the Challenges and Benefits of the Bug Bounty Ecosystem
Omer Akgul, Taha Eghtesad, Amit Elazari +5
Although researchers have characterized the bug-bounty ecosystem from the point of view of platforms and programs, minimal effort has been made to understand the perspectives of th…
An Observational Investigation of Reverse Engineers' Processes
Daniel Votipka, Seth M. Rabin, Kristopher Micinski +2
Reverse engineering is a complex process essential to software-security tasks such as vulnerability discovery and malware analysis. Significant research and engineering effort has…
Build It, Break It, Fix It: Contesting Secure Development
James Parker, Michael Hicks, Andrew Ruef +5
Typical security contests focus on breaking or mitigating the impact of buggy systems. We present the Build-it, Break-it, Fix-it (BIBIFI) contest, which aims to assess the ability…
Build It, Break It, Fix It: Contesting Secure Development
Andrew Ruef, Michael Hicks, James Parker +3
Typical security contests focus on breaking or mitigating the impact of buggy systems. We present the Build-it Break-it Fix-it BIBIFI contest which aims to assess the ability to se…