activity
20162026
most citedSoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User Research

61 citations · 209 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CRShow all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.CR2026

Continuous Discovery of Vulnerabilities in LLM Serving Systems with Fuzzing

Yunze Zhao, Yibo Zhao, Yuchen Zhang +2

LLM inference and serving systems have become security-critical infrastructure; however, many of their most concerning failures arise from the serving layer rather than from model…

cs.CR2024★ 1 cited

As Advertised? Understanding the Impact of Influencer VPN Ads

Omer Akgul, Richard Roberts, Emma Shroyer +2

Influencer VPN ads (sponsored segments) on YouTube often disseminate misleading information about both VPNs, and security & privacy more broadly. However, it remains unclear how (o…

cs.CR2023★ 11 cited

Bug Hunters' Perspectives on the Challenges and Benefits of the Bug Bounty Ecosystem

Omer Akgul, Taha Eghtesad, Amit Elazari +5

Although researchers have characterized the bug-bounty ecosystem from the point of view of platforms and programs, minimal effort has been made to understand the perspectives of th…

cs.CR2021★ 2 cited

Strategies and Perceived Risks of Sending Sensitive Documents

Noel Warford, Collins W. Munyendo, Ashna Mediratta +2

People are frequently required to send documents, forms, or other materials containing sensitive data (e.g., personal information, medical records, financial data) to remote partie…

cs.CR2019★ 3 cited

An Observational Investigation of Reverse Engineers' Processes

Daniel Votipka, Seth M. Rabin, Kristopher Micinski +2

Reverse engineering is a complex process essential to software-security tasks such as vulnerability discovery and malware analysis. Significant research and engineering effort has…

cs.CR2019★ 24 cited

Build It, Break It, Fix It: Contesting Secure Development

James Parker, Michael Hicks, Andrew Ruef +5

Typical security contests focus on breaking or mitigating the impact of buggy systems. We present the Build-it, Break-it, Fix-it (BIBIFI) contest, which aims to assess the ability…

cs.CR2016★ 29 cited

Build It, Break It, Fix It: Contesting Secure Development

Andrew Ruef, Michael Hicks, James Parker +3

Typical security contests focus on breaking or mitigating the impact of buggy systems. We present the Build-it Break-it Fix-it BIBIFI contest which aims to assess the ability to se…