324 citations · 6.3k across the 131 of their papers we have counts for
10 papers · 1 filter
The balance of knowledge flows
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Massimiliano Carloni
In analogy to the technology balance of payments, in this paper we propose a possible way to set up a "balance of knowledge flows" (BKF), recording world flows of knowledge within…
Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Felici
The ability to predict the long-term impact of a scientific article soon after its publication is of great value towards accurate assessment of research performance. In this work w…
The collaboration behavior of top scientists
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
The intention of this work is to analyze top scientists' collaboration behavior at the "international", "domestic extramural" and "intramural" levels, and compare it to that of the…
Testing for universality of Mendeley readership distributions
Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Samuele Di Russo
Altmetrics promise useful support for assessing the impact of scientific works, including beyond the scholarly community and with very limited citation windows. Unfortunately, altm…
A nation's foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (The Italian case)
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
This work investigates the research performance of foreign faculty in the Italian academic system. Incoming professors compose l'1% of total faculty across the sciences, although w…
Peer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Emanuela Reale
In this work, we try to answer the question of which method, peer review vs bibliometrics, better predicts the future overall scholarly impact of scientific publications. We measur…