activity
20182026
most citedEvaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposure

176 citations · 605 across the 32 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2023Show all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.IR2023★ 5 cited

Candidate Set Sampling for Evaluating Top-N Recommendation

Ngozi Ihemelandu, Michael D. Ekstrand

The strategy for selecting candidate sets -- the set of items that the recommendation system is expected to rank for each user -- is an important decision in carrying out an offlin…

cs.IR2023★ 18 cited

Distributionally-Informed Recommender System Evaluation

Michael D. Ekstrand, Ben Carterette, Fernando Diaz

Current practice for evaluating recommender systems typically focuses on point estimates of user-oriented effectiveness metrics or business metrics, sometimes combined with additio…

cs.IR2023★ 3 cited

Inference at Scale Significance Testing for Large Search and Recommendation Experiments

Ngozi Ihemelandu, Michael D. Ekstrand

A number of information retrieval studies have been done to assess which statistical techniques are appropriate for comparing systems. However, these studies are focused on TREC-st…

cs.IR2023★ 5 cited

Patterns of gender-specializing query reformulation

Amifa Raj, Bhaskar Mitra, Nick Craswell +1

Users of search systems often reformulate their queries by adding query terms to reflect their evolving information need or to more precisely express their information need when th…

cs.IR2023

Overview of the TREC 2021 Fair Ranking Track

Michael D. Ekstrand, Graham McDonald, Amifa Raj +1

The TREC Fair Ranking Track aims to provide a platform for participants to develop and evaluate novel retrieval algorithms that can provide a fair exposure to a mixture of demograp…

cs.IR2023

Overview of the TREC 2022 Fair Ranking Track

Michael D. Ekstrand, Graham McDonald, Amifa Raj +1

The TREC Fair Ranking Track aims to provide a platform for participants to develop and evaluate novel retrieval algorithms that can provide a fair exposure to a mixture of demograp…