collaborators

9 papers

cs.CL2026

How Does Alignment Tuning Shape Representations of Sycophancy and Related Cue-Induced Biases in LLMs?

Prakhar Gupta, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Florent Draye +2

Modern LLMs are alarmingly susceptible to surprisingly simple immaterial changes of input prompts: a casual hint, an incorrectly labeled few-shot example, or a fake prior assistant…

cs.CV2026

PruneGround: Plug-and-play Spatial Pruning for 3D Visual Grounding

Duc Cao Dinh, Khai Le-Duc, Florent Draye +4

3D Visual Grounding (3DVG) aims to localize target objects in 3D scenes given natural language descriptions. Existing approaches typically perform reasoning over the entire scene,…

cs.AI2026

Transferability for General Reasoning: An Automated Curriculum for Multi-Domain RLVR

Yongjin Yang, Jiarui Liu, Yinghui He +3

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been extended from single-domain training to multi-domain reasoning suites spanning mathematics, programming, and science.…

cs.CL2026

Evaluating Second-Order Bias of LLMs Through Epistemic Entitlement

Ramaravind Kommiya Mothilal, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Raiyan Ahmed +3

Evaluations of social bias in LLMs largely focus on whether models generate or imply biased content. However, as LLMs are increasingly used as judges of bias, they may exhibit soci…

cs.LG2026

STRIDE: Training Data Attribution via Sparse Recovery from Subset Perturbations

Rishit Dagli, Abir Harrasse, Luke Zhang +4

Training Data Attribution (TDA) seeks to trace a model's predictions back to its training data. The gold standard for TDA relies on causal interventions, observing how a model chan…

cs.CR2026

TamperBench: Systematically Stress-Testing LLM Safety Under Fine-Tuning and Tampering

Saad Hossain, Tom Tseng, Punya Syon Pandey +8

As increasingly capable open-weight large language models (LLMs) are deployed, improving their tamper resistance against unsafe modifications, whether accidental or intentional, be…