33 citations · 82 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Remarks on "Note about Hamiltonian formalism of healthy extended Hořava-Lifshitz gravity" by J. Klusoň
N. Kiriushcheva, P. G. Komorowski, S. V. Kuzmin
We reassess the conclusion by Klusoň (J. High Energy Phys. 1007 (2010) 038) that the Hamiltonian formulation of the healthy extended Hořava-Lifshitz gravity does not present any pr…
Comment on "Gauge Symmetries and Dirac Conjecture" by Y.-L. Wang, Z.-P. Li, K. Wang and some other counterexamples to the Dirac conjecture
N. Kiriushcheva, P. G. Komorowski, S. V. Kuzmin
We argue that the conclusion about the invalidity of the Dirac conjecture, made in the paper by Wang, Li, and Wang (Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 1894, 2009), was based upon a flawed ana…
An Analysis of the First Order Form of Gauge Theories
N. Kiriushcheva, S. V. Kuzmin, D. G. C. McKeon
The first order form of a Maxwell theory and U(1) gauge theory in which a gauge invariant mass term appears is analyzed using the Dirac procedure. The form of the gauge transformat…
Comment on "Arnowitt--Deser--Misner representation and Hamiltonian analysis of covariant renormalizable gravity" by M. Chaichian, M. Oksanen, A. Tureanu
N. Kiriushcheva, P. G. Komorowski, S. V. Kuzmin
The partial Hamiltonian analysis of the actions presented in the paper by M. Chaichian, M. Oksanen, A. Tureanu (Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1657 (2011)) is incorrect; the true algebra of c…
Comment on `Hamiltonian formulation for the theory of gravity and canonical transformations in extended phase space' by T P Shestakova
N. Kiriushcheva, P. G. Komorowski, S. V. Kuzmin
We argue that the conclusion, `we cannot consider the Dirac approach as fundamental and undoubted', made in the paper by Shestakova (Class. Quantum Grav. 28 055009, 2011), is based…