works on

From the 1 of 19 linked papers with an AI index.

collaborators

19 papers

cs.HC2026

Informal Learning Emerges in Everyday Human-LLM Interaction

Zixin Chen, Haotian Li, Ziang Xiao +2

As LLMs become increasingly capable of completing tasks for users, a central concern is that everyday AI use may become primarily cognitive offloading, eroding the opportunities th…

cs.AI2026

Can We Trust Item Response Theory for AI Evaluation?

Han Jiang, Sunbeom Kwon, Jinwen Luo +2

The paper investigates how well item response theory (IRT) works for evaluating large language model benchmarks, highlighting challenges when benchmark data differ from traditional…

cs.HC2026

AI-Mediated Negotiation: Design Reflections and Lessons

Veda Duddu, Jash Rajesh Parekh, Andy Mao +4

Conversational AI promises a new kind of preparation for high-stakes workplace negotiations -- personalized, interactive, and capable of simulating realistic resistance. That promi…

cs.CL2026

On Defining Erasure Harms for NLP

Yu Lu Liu, Arnav Goel, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung +3

The deployment of NLP systems has raised concerns about harms they might produce, including representational harms. Recent literature has begun to conceptualize and measure one suc…

cs.CL2026

PICACO: Pluralistic In-Context Value Alignment of LLMs via Total Correlation Optimization

Han Jiang, Dongyao Zhu, Xiaoyuan Yi +3

In-Context Learning has shown great potential for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values, helping reduce harmful outputs and accommodate diverse preferences withou…

cs.AI2026

AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases

Han Jiang, Susu Zhang, Dongyao Zhu +6

This position paper argues that standardized item-level benchmark data should become the default infrastructure for AI evaluation. Current evaluations suffer from underspecified it…