activity
20162026
most citedAn Analysis of Attacks on Blockchain Consensus

18 citations · 50 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CRShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.CR2026

Contrastive Privacy: A Semantic Approach to Measuring Privacy of AI-based Sanitization

George Bissias, Eugene Bagdasarian, Brian Neil Levine

AI-based sanitization can remove concepts from images and text, but privacy evaluation remains largely ad hoc. We propose contrastive privacy, a formal definition that yields a qua…

cs.CR2023

Generic Selfish Mining MDP for DAG Protocols

Patrik Keller

Selfish Mining is strategic rule-breaking to maximize rewards in proof-of-work protocols [3] and Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are the preferred tool for finding optimal strateg…

cs.CR2023

Tailstorm: A Secure and Fair Blockchain for Cash Transactions

Patrik Keller, Ben Glickenhaus, George Bissias +1

Proof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrencies rely on a balance of security and fairness in order to maintain a sustainable ecosystem of miners and users. Users demand fast and consistent t…

cs.CR2020★ 1 cited

Pricing Security in Proof-of-Work Systems

George Bissias, Rainer Böhme, David Thibodeau +1

A key component of security in decentralized blockchains is proof of opportunity cost among block producers. In the case of proof-of-work (PoW), currently used by the most prominen…

cs.CR2020

Radium: Improving Dynamic PoW Targeting

George Bissias

Most PoW blockchain protocols operate with a simple mechanism whereby a threshold is set for each block and miners generate block hashes until one of those values falls below the t…

cs.CR2019

Bonded Mining: Difficulty Adjustment by Miner Commitment

George Bissias, David Thibodeau, Brian N. Levine

Proof-of-work blockchains must implement a difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA) in order to maintain a consistent inter-arrival time between blocks. Conventional DAAs are essentia…

cs.CR2018

Using Economic Risk to Model Miner Hash Rate Allocation in Cryptocurrencies

George Bissias, Brian N. Levine, David Thibodeau

Abrupt changes in the miner hash rate applied to a proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain can adversely affect user experience and security. Because different PoW blockchains often share h…

cs.CR2017★ 10 cited

Bobtail: A Proof-of-Work Target that Minimizes Blockchain Mining Variance (Draft)

George Bissias, Brian Neil Levine

Blockchain systems are designed to produce blocks at a constant average rate. The most popular systems currently employ a Proof of Work (PoW) algorithm as a means of creating these…

cs.CR2017★ 15 cited

Estimation of Miner Hash Rates and Consensus on Blockchains (draft)

A. Pinar Ozisik, George Bissias, Brian Levine

We make several contributions that quantify the real-time hash rate and therefore the consensus of a blockchain. We show that by using only the hash value of blocks, we can estimat…

cs.CR2017

Securing the Assets of Decentralized Applications using Financial Derivatives (DRAFT)

George Bissias, Brian Levine, Nikunj Kapadia

Ethereum contracts can be designed to function as fully decentralized applications called DAPPs. Many DAPPs have already been fielded, including an online marketplace, a role playi…

cs.CR2016★ 18 cited

An Analysis of Attacks on Blockchain Consensus

George Bissias, Brian Neil Levine, A. Pinar Ozisik +1

We present and validate a novel mathematical model of the blockchain mining process and use it to conduct an economic evaluation of the double-spend attack, which is fundamental to…