activity
20122026
most citedFooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods

168 citations · 871 across the 72 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

45 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods

Michal Moshkovitz, Suraj Srinivas, Lesia Semenova +7

Despite the proliferation of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques -- from feature attributions to sparse autoencoders -- explanations rarely influence real-world workflows. In practice,…

cs.LG2024

Generalized Group Data Attribution

Dan Ley, Suraj Srinivas, Shichang Zhang +2

Data Attribution (DA) methods quantify the influence of individual training data points on model outputs and have broad applications such as explainability, data selection, and noi…

cs.LG2024

Learning Recourse Costs from Pairwise Feature Comparisons

Kaivalya Rawal, Himabindu Lakkaraju

This paper presents a novel technique for incorporating user input when learning and inferring user preferences. When trying to provide users of black-box machine learning models w…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

Interpretability Needs a New Paradigm

Andreas Madsen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Siva Reddy +1

Interpretability is the study of explaining models in understandable terms to humans. At present, interpretability is divided into two paradigms: the intrinsic paradigm, which beli…

cs.LG2024

Data Poisoning Attacks on Off-Policy Policy Evaluation Methods

Elita Lobo, Harvineet Singh, Marek Petrik +2

Off-policy Evaluation (OPE) methods are a crucial tool for evaluating policies in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, where exploration is often infeasible, unethical, or expen…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)

Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas +2

CLIP embeddings have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of multimodal applications. However, these high-dimensional, dense vector representations are not easil…

cs.LG2023★ 13 cited

In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners

Martin Pawelczyk, Seth Neel, Himabindu Lakkaraju

Machine unlearning, the study of efficiently removing the impact of specific training instances on a model, has garnered increased attention in recent years due to regulatory guide…

cs.LG2023

On the Trade-offs between Adversarial Robustness and Actionable Explanations

Satyapriya Krishna, Chirag Agarwal, Himabindu Lakkaraju

As machine learning models are increasingly being employed in various high-stakes settings, it becomes important to ensure that predictions of these models are not only adversarial…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage

Catherine Huang, Chelse Swoopes, Christina Xiao +2

Machine learning models are increasingly utilized across impactful domains to predict individual outcomes. As such, many models provide algorithmic recourse to individuals who rece…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Discriminative Feature Attributions: Bridging Post Hoc Explainability and Inherent Interpretability

Usha Bhalla, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu Lakkaraju

With the increased deployment of machine learning models in various real-world applications, researchers and practitioners alike have emphasized the need for explanations of model…

cs.LG2023

Characterizing Data Point Vulnerability via Average-Case Robustness

Tessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu Lakkaraju

Studying the robustness of machine learning models is important to ensure consistent model behaviour across real-world settings. To this end, adversarial robustness is a standard f…

cs.LG2023

Consistent Explanations in the Face of Model Indeterminacy via Ensembling

Dan Ley, Leonard Tang, Matthew Nazari +3

This work addresses the challenge of providing consistent explanations for predictive models in the presence of model indeterminacy, which arises due to the existence of multiple (…

cs.LG2023

On Minimizing the Impact of Dataset Shifts on Actionable Explanations

Anna P. Meyer, Dan Ley, Suraj Srinivas +1

The Right to Explanation is an important regulatory principle that allows individuals to request actionable explanations for algorithmic decisions. However, several technical chall…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold Robustness

Suraj Srinivas, Sebastian Bordt, Hima Lakkaraju

One of the remarkable properties of robust computer vision models is that their input-gradients are often aligned with human perception, referred to in the literature as perceptual…

cs.LG2022★ 4 cited

On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recourse

Martin Pawelczyk, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Seth Neel

As predictive models are increasingly being employed to make consequential decisions, there is a growing emphasis on developing techniques that can provide algorithmic recourse to…

cs.LG2022★ 2 cited

Towards Robust Off-Policy Evaluation via Human Inputs

Harvineet Singh, Shalmali Joshi, Finale Doshi-Velez +1

Off-policy Evaluation (OPE) methods are crucial tools for evaluating policies in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, where direct deployment is often infeasible, unethical, or…

cs.LG2022★ 10 cited

Evaluating Explainability for Graph Neural Networks

Chirag Agarwal, Owen Queen, Himabindu Lakkaraju +1

As post hoc explanations are increasingly used to understand the behavior of graph neural networks (GNNs), it becomes crucial to evaluate the quality and reliability of GNN explana…

cs.LG2022★ 7 cited

TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversations

Dylan Slack, Satyapriya Krishna, Himabindu Lakkaraju +1

Machine Learning (ML) models are increasingly used to make critical decisions in real-world applications, yet they have become more complex, making them harder to understand. To th…

cs.LG2022★ 55 cited

Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanations

Jessica Dai, Sohini Upadhyay, Ulrich Aivodji +2

As post hoc explanation methods are increasingly being leveraged to explain complex models in high-stakes settings, it becomes critical to ensure that the quality of the resulting…

cs.LG2022★ 82 cited

OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations

Chirag Agarwal, Dan Ley, Satyapriya Krishna +6

While several types of post hoc explanation methods have been proposed in recent literature, there is very little work on systematically benchmarking these methods. Here, we introd…

cs.LG2022

Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networks

Suraj Srinivas, Kyle Matoba, Himabindu Lakkaraju +1

The highly non-linear nature of deep neural networks causes them to be susceptible to adversarial examples and have unstable gradients which hinders interpretability. However, exis…

cs.LG2022★ 1 cited

A Human-Centric Take on Model Monitoring

Murtuza N Shergadwala, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Krishnaram Kenthapadi

Predictive models are increasingly used to make various consequential decisions in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and policy. It becomes critical to ensure that t…

cs.LG2022★ 28 cited

Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanations

Tessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu Lakkaraju

A critical problem in the field of post hoc explainability is the lack of a common foundational goal among methods. For example, some methods are motivated by function approximatio…

cs.LG2022★ 4 cited

Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanations

Chirag Agarwal, Nari Johnson, Martin Pawelczyk +4

As attribution-based explanation methods are increasingly used to establish model trustworthiness in high-stakes situations, it is critical to ensure that these explanations are st…