activity
20152020
most citedSparsity information and regularization in the horseshoe and other shrinkage priors

484 citations · 1.1k across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

stat.ME2020★ 2 cited

Using reference models in variable selection

Federico Pavone, Juho Piironen, Paul-Christian Bürkner +1

Variable selection, or more generally, model reduction is an important aspect of the statistical workflow aiming to provide insights from data. In this paper, we discuss and demons…

cs.LG2019★ 18 cited

A Decision-Theoretic Approach for Model Interpretability in Bayesian Framework

Homayun Afrabandpey, Tomi Peltola, Juho Piironen +2

A salient approach to interpretable machine learning is to restrict modeling to simple models. In the Bayesian framework, this can be pursued by restricting the model structure and…

stat.CO2019★ 39 cited

Implicitly Adaptive Importance Sampling

Topi Paananen, Juho Piironen, Paul-Christian Bürkner +1

Adaptive importance sampling is a class of techniques for finding good proposal distributions for importance sampling. Often the proposal distributions are standard probability dis…

stat.ML2018★ 108 cited

Projective Inference in High-dimensional Problems: Prediction and Feature Selection

Juho Piironen, Markus Paasiniemi, Aki Vehtari

This paper discusses predictive inference and feature selection for generalized linear models with scarce but high-dimensional data. We argue that in many cases one can benefit fro…

stat.AP2018★ 8 cited

Bayesian Estimation of Gaussian Graphical Models with Predictive Covariance Selection

Donald R. Williams, Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari +1

Gaussian graphical models are used for determining conditional relationships between variables. This is accomplished by identifying off-diagonal elements in the inverse-covariance…

stat.ME2017★ 32 cited

Variable selection for Gaussian processes via sensitivity analysis of the posterior predictive distribution

Topi Paananen, Juho Piironen, Michael Riis Andersen +1

Variable selection for Gaussian process models is often done using automatic relevance determination, which uses the inverse length-scale parameter of each input variable as a prox…

stat.ME2017★ 7 cited

Iterative Supervised Principal Components

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

In high-dimensional prediction problems, where the number of features may greatly exceed the number of training instances, fully Bayesian approach with a sparsifying prior is known…

stat.ME2017★ 484 cited

Sparsity information and regularization in the horseshoe and other shrinkage priors

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

The horseshoe prior has proven to be a noteworthy alternative for sparse Bayesian estimation, but has previously suffered from two problems. First, there has been no systematic way…

stat.ME2016★ 5 cited

Automatic monotonicity detection for Gaussian Processes

Eero Siivola, Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

We propose a new method for automatically detecting monotonic input-output relationships from data using Gaussian Process (GP) models with virtual derivative observations. Our resu…

stat.ME2016★ 32 cited

On the Hyperprior Choice for the Global Shrinkage Parameter in the Horseshoe Prior

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

The horseshoe prior has proven to be a noteworthy alternative for sparse Bayesian estimation, but as shown in this paper, the results can be sensitive to the prior choice for the g…

stat.ME2015★ 33 cited

Projection predictive model selection for Gaussian processes

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

We propose a new method for simplification of Gaussian process (GP) models by projecting the information contained in the full encompassing model and selecting a reduced number of…

stat.ME2015★ 19 cited

Projection predictive variable selection using Stan+R

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

This document is additional material to our previous study comparing several strategies for variable subset selection. Our recommended approach was to fit the full model with all t…

stat.ME2015★ 328 cited

Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection

Juho Piironen, Aki Vehtari

The goal of this paper is to compare several widely used Bayesian model selection methods in practical model selection problems, highlight their differences and give recommendation…