activity
20162025
most citedPredicting article quality scores with machine learning: The UK Research Excellence Framework

27 citations · 105 across the 20 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.DLShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.DL2025

Identifying and extracting Data Access Statements from full-text academic articles

David Pride, Matteo Cancellieri, Petr Knoth

A Data Access Statement (DAS) is a formal declaration detailing how and where the underlying research data associated with a publication can be accessed. It promotes transparency,…

cs.DL2025

USRN Discovery Pilot: Increasing the Discoverability of Open Access Content Through a National Network

Petr Knoth, Paul Walk, Matteo Cancellieri +5

This paper presents the results of the USRN Discovery Pilot Project, a collaboration of SPARC, the Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR), CORE and Antleaf, to enhance th…

cs.DL2025

Making Software FAIR: A machine-assisted workflow for the research software lifecycle

Petr Knoth, Laurent Romary, Patrice Lopez +7

A key issue hindering discoverability, attribution and reusability of open research software is that its existence often remains hidden within the manuscript of research papers. Fo…

cs.DL2022★ 27 cited

Predicting article quality scores with machine learning: The UK Research Excellence Framework

Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli +6

National research evaluation initiatives and incentive schemes have previously chosen between simplistic quantitative indicators and time-consuming peer review, sometimes supported…

cs.DL2019★ 12 cited

Do Authors Deposit on Time? Tracking Open Access Policy Compliance

Drahomira Herrmannova, Nancy Pontika, Petr Knoth

Recent years have seen fast growth in the number of policies mandating Open Access (OA) to research outputs. We conduct a large-scale analysis of over 800 thousand papers from repo…

cs.DL2018

Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis

David Pride, Petr Knoth

Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different methodologies which are sometimes combined. A common argument…

cs.DL2018★ 21 cited

Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?

Drahomira Herrmannova, Robert M. Patton, Petr Knoth +1

In this paper, we show that citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a margin of 10%) in distinguishing excellent research, while Mendeley reader counts don't work be…

cs.DL2017

Incidental or influential? - Challenges in automatically detecting citation importance using publication full texts

David Pride, Petr Knoth

This work looks in depth at several studies that have attempted to automate the process of citation importance classification based on the publications full text. We analyse a rang…

cs.DL2017★ 1 cited

Classifying document types to enhance search and recommendations in digital libraries

Aristotelis Charalampous, Petr Knoth

In this paper, we address the problem of classifying documents available from the global network of (open access) repositories according to their type. We show that the metadata pr…

cs.DL2017★ 16 cited

Towards effective research recommender systems for repositories

Petr Knoth, Lucas Anastasiou, Aristotelis Charalampous +4

In this paper, we argue why and how the integration of recommender systems for research can enhance the functionality and user experience in repositories. We present the latest tec…

cs.DL2016★ 4 cited

Semantometrics: Towards Fulltext-based Research Evaluation

Drahomira Herrmannova, Petr Knoth

Over the recent years, there has been a growing interest in developing new research evaluation methods that could go beyond the traditional citation-based metrics. This interest is…