activity
20172025
most citedCodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation

416 citations · 1.4k across the 24 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

26 papers

cs.SE2025

Enabling Global, Human-Centered Explanations for LLMs:From Tokens to Interpretable Code and Test Generation

Dipin Khati, Daniel Rodriguez-Cardenas, David N. Palacio +3

As Large Language Models for Code (LM4Code) become integral to software engineering, establishing trust in their output becomes critical. However, standard accuracy metrics obscure…

cs.SE2025★ 3 cited

Reinforcement Learning from Automatic Feedback for High-Quality Unit Test Generation

Benjamin Steenhoek, Michele Tufano, Neel Sundaresan +1

Software testing is a crucial but time-consuming aspect of software development, and recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained popularity for automated test case generatio…

cs.SE2024★ 12 cited

AutoDev: Automated AI-Driven Development

Michele Tufano, Anisha Agarwal, Jinu Jang +2

The landscape of software development has witnessed a paradigm shift with the advent of AI-powered assistants, exemplified by GitHub Copilot. However, existing solutions are not le…

cs.SE2024★ 6 cited

Copilot Evaluation Harness: Evaluating LLM-Guided Software Programming

Anisha Agarwal, Aaron Chan, Shubham Chandel +6

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Development Environments (IDEs) has become a focal point in modern software development. LLMs such as OpenAI GPT-3.5/4 and Code…

cs.SE2023★ 3 cited

Reinforcement Learning from Automatic Feedback for High-Quality Unit Test Generation

Benjamin Steenhoek, Michele Tufano, Neel Sundaresan +1

Software testing is a crucial aspect of software development, and the creation of high-quality tests that adhere to best practices is essential for effective maintenance. Recently,…

cs.SE2023★ 4 cited

Predicting Code Coverage without Execution

Michele Tufano, Shubham Chandel, Anisha Agarwal +2

Code coverage is a widely used metric for quantifying the extent to which program elements, such as statements or branches, are executed during testing. Calculating code coverage i…

cs.SE2023★ 2 cited

InferFix: End-to-End Program Repair with LLMs

Matthew Jin, Syed Shahriar, Michele Tufano +4

Software development life cycle is profoundly influenced by bugs: their introduction, identification, and eventual resolution account for a significant portion of software cost. Th…

cs.SE2023★ 12 cited

An Empirical Investigation into the Use of Image Captioning for Automated Software Documentation

Kevin Moran, Ali Yachnes, George Purnell +5

Existing automated techniques for software documentation typically attempt to reason between two main sources of information: code and natural language. However, this reasoning pro…

cs.SE2022★ 11 cited

Exploring and Evaluating Personalized Models for Code Generation

Andrei Zlotchevski, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy +3

Large Transformer models achieved the state-of-the-art status for Natural Language Understanding tasks and are increasingly becoming the baseline model architecture for modeling so…

cs.SE2022★ 39 cited

Methods2Test: A dataset of focal methods mapped to test cases

Michele Tufano, Shao Kun Deng, Neel Sundaresan +1

Unit testing is an essential part of the software development process, which helps to identify issues with source code in early stages of development and prevent regressions. Machi…

cs.LG2021

Long-Range Modeling of Source Code Files with eWASH: Extended Window Access by Syntax Hierarchy

Colin B. Clement, Shuai Lu, Xiaoyu Liu +5

Statistical language modeling and translation with transformers have found many successful applications in program understanding and generation tasks, setting high benchmarks for t…

cs.SE2021★ 416 cited

CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation

Shuai Lu, Daya Guo, Shuo Ren +19

Benchmark datasets have a significant impact on accelerating research in programming language tasks. In this paper, we introduce CodeXGLUE, a benchmark dataset to foster machine le…

cs.SE2021

Towards Automating Code Review Activities

Rosalia Tufano, Luca Pascarella, Michele Tufano +2

Code reviews are popular in both industrial and open source projects. The benefits of code reviews are widely recognized and include better code quality and lower likelihood of int…

cs.SE2020★ 97 cited

Generating Accurate Assert Statements for Unit Test Cases using Pretrained Transformers

Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy +1

Unit testing represents the foundational basis of the software testing pyramid, beneath integration and end-to-end testing. Automated software testing researchers have proposed a v…

cs.SE2020★ 8 cited

Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers and Focal Context

Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy +2

Automated unit test case generation tools facilitate test-driven development and support developers by suggesting tests intended to identify flaws in their code. Existing approache…

cs.SE2020★ 106 cited

On Learning Meaningful Assert Statements for Unit Test Cases

Cody Watson, Michele Tufano, Kevin Moran +2

Software testing is an essential part of the software lifecycle and requires a substantial amount of time and effort. It has been estimated that software developers spend close to…

cs.SE2020★ 17 cited

DeepMutation: A Neural Mutation Tool

Michele Tufano, Jason Kimko, Shiya Wang +4

Mutation testing can be used to assess the fault-detection capabilities of a given test suite. To this aim, two characteristics of mutation testing frameworks are of paramount impo…

cs.SE2019★ 3 cited

On Learning Meaningful Code Changes via Neural Machine Translation

Michele Tufano, Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Cody Watson +2

Recent years have seen the rise of Deep Learning (DL) techniques applied to source code. Researchers have exploited DL to automate several development and maintenance tasks, such a…

cs.SE2019★ 1 cited

Towards Predicting the Impact of Software Changes on Building Activities

Michele Tufano, Hitesh Sajnani, Kim Herzig

The pervasive adoption of Continuous Integration practices -- both in industry and open source projects -- has led software building to become a daily activity for thousands of dev…

cs.SE2019

Guigle: A GUI Search Engine for Android Apps

Carlos Bernal-Cardenas, Kevin Moran, Michele Tufano +4

The process of developing a mobile application typically starts with the ideation and conceptualization of its user interface. This concept is then translated into a set of mock-up…

cs.SE2019★ 397 cited

SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repair

Zimin Chen, Steve Kommrusch, Michele Tufano +3

This paper presents a novel end-to-end approach to program repair based on sequence-to-sequence learning. We devise, implement, and evaluate a system, called SequenceR, for fixing…

cs.SE2018

Learning How to Mutate Source Code from Bug-Fixes

Michele Tufano, Cody Watson, Gabriele Bavota +3

Mutation testing has been widely accepted as an approach to guide test case generation or to assess the effectiveness of test suites. Empirical studies have shown that mutants are…

cs.SE2018★ 4 cited

An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translation

Michele Tufano, Cody Watson, Gabriele Bavota +3

Millions of open-source projects with numerous bug fixes are available in code repositories. This proliferation of software development histories can be leveraged to learn how to f…

cs.SE2018★ 40 cited

MDroid+: A Mutation Testing Framework for Android

Kevin Moran, Michele Tufano, Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas +5

Mutation testing has shown great promise in assessing the effectiveness of test suites while exhibiting additional applications to test-case generation, selection, and prioritizati…