Bohmian mechanics and consistent histories
arXiv:quant-ph/9902059 · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00542-3
Abstract
The interpretations of a particular quantum gedanken experiment provided by Bohmian mechanics and consistent histories are shown to contradict each other, both in the absence and in the presence of a measuring device. The consistent history result seems closer to standard quantum mechanics, and shows no evidence of the mysterious nonlocal influences present in the Bohmian description.
Minor revision of earlier version. Latex, 10 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Do we really understand quantum mechanics?
- Bohmian mechanics contradicts quantum mechanics
- Surrealistic Bohmian trajectories do not occur with macroscopic pointers
- Quantum trajectories, real, surreal or an approximation to a deeper process?
- Negative Probabilities, Fine's Theorem and Linear Positivity
- Realism and causality I: Pilot wave and retrocausal models as possible facilitators
- Wheeler-DeWitt quantization and singularities
- Bohmian description of a decaying quantum system
- Bohmian Histories and Decoherent Histories
- Consistent Quantum Measurements
- Consistent Histories and the Bohm Approach
- Interpretation of quantum theory - An overview