Reply on the ``Comment on `Loss-error compensation in quantum- state measurements' ''
arXiv:quant-ph/9801028 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3134
Abstract
The authors of the Comment [G. M. D'Ariano and C. Macchiavello to be published in Phys. Rev. A, quant-ph/9701009] tried to reestablish a 0.5 efficiency bound for loss compensation in optical homodyne tomography. In our reply we demonstrate that neither does such a rigorous bound exist nor is the bound required for ruling out the state reconstruction of an individual system [G. M. D'Ariano and H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2832 (1996)].
LaTex, 2 pages, 1 Figure; to be published in Physical Review A
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Quantum Tomography
- Recovering coherence from decoherence: a method of quantum state reconstruction
- Reconstruction of photon statistics using low performance photon counters
- Pulsed homodyne Gaussian quantum tomography with low detection efficiency
- Statistical uncertainty in quantum optical photodetection measurements
- Quantum interferences reconstruction with low homodyne detection efficiency
- Sampling the canonical phase from phase-space functions
- Measuring Quantum State in Phase Space