Quantum deletion: Beyond the no-deletion principle
arXiv:quant-ph/0510182 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052321
Abstract
Suppose we are given two identical copies of an unknown quantum state and we wish to delete one copy from among the given two copies. The quantum no-deletion principle restricts us from perfectly deleting a copy but it does not prohibit us from deleting a copy approximately. Here we construct two types of a universal quantum deletion machine which approximately deletes a copy such that the fidelity of deletion does not depend on the input state. The two types of universal quantum deletion machines are (1) a conventional deletion machine described by one unitary operator and (2) a modified deletion machine described by two unitary operators. Here it is shown that modified deletion machine deletes a qubit with fidelity 0.75, which is the maximum limit for deleting an unknown quantum state. In addition to this we also show that the modified deletion machine retains the qubit in the first mode with average fidelity 0.77 (approx.) which is slightly greater than the fidelity of measurement for two given identical state, showing how precisely one can determine its state [13]. We also show that the deletion machine itself is input state independent i.e. the information is not hidden in the deleting machine, and hence we can delete the information completely from the deletion machine.
11 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Deterministic versus probabilistic quantum information masking
- Deletion, Bell's Inequality, Teleportation
- Complementarity of Quantum Correlations in Cloning and Deleting of Quantum State
- Improving the Fidelity of deletion
- Spatial order in a two-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled spin-1/2 condensate: superlattice, multi-ring and stripe formation
- Quantum no-go theorems in causality respecting systems in presence of closed timelike curves: Tweaking the Deutsch condition
- Quantum Cloning and Deletion in Quantum Information Theory
- Probabilistic exact deletion and probabilistic no-signalling