On the performance of two protocols: SARG04 and BB84
arXiv:quant-ph/0510025 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012337
Abstract
We compare the performance of BB84 and SARG04, the later of which was proposed by V. Scarani et al., in Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004). Specifically, in this paper, we investigate SARG04 with two-way classical communications and SARG04 with decoy states. In the first part of the paper, we show that SARG04 with two-way communications can tolerate a higher bit error rate (19.4% for a one-photon source and 6.56% for a two-photon source) than SARG04 with one-way communications (10.95% for a one-photon source and 2.71% for a two-photon source). Also, the upper bounds on the bit error rate for SARG04 with two-way communications are computed in a closed form by considering an individual attack based on a general measurement. In the second part of the paper, we propose employing the idea of decoy states in SARG04 to obtain unconditional security even when realistic devices are used. We compare the performance of SARG04 with decoy states and BB84 with decoy states. We find that the optimal mean-photon number for SARG04 is higher than that of BB84 when the bit error rate is small. Also, we observe that SARG04 does not achieve a longer secure distance and a higher key generation rate than BB84, assuming a typical experimental parameter set.
48 pages, 10 figures, 1 column, changed Figs. 7 and 9
References in corpus (7)
- Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution
- Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography
- Practical Decoy State for Quantum Key Distribution
- Quantum key distribution over 122 km of standard telecom fiber
- A decoy-state protocol for quantum cryptography with 4 intensities of coherent states
- Security of two quantum cryptography protocols using the same four qubit states
- Unconditional Security of Three State Quantum Key Distribution Protocols
Cited by in corpus (29)
- The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution
- Phase-Remapping Attack in Practical Quantum Key Distribution Systems
- Practical issues in quantum-key-distribution post-processing
- Finite-key analysis for practical implementations of quantum key distribution
- Experimental free-space quantum secure direct communication and its security analysis
- Practical Quantum Digital Signature
- Security proof for QKD systems with threshold detectors
- Decoy state quantum key distribution with two-way classical post-processing
- Practical long-distance quantum key distribution system using decoy levels
- Security of quantum key distribution protocols using two-way classical communication or weak coherent pulses
- Security proof of a three-state quantum key distribution protocol without rotational symmetry
- Photon-number-solving Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution
- Analysis of atmospheric effects on satellite based quantum communication: A comparative study
- Quantum key distribution protocol based on contextuality monogamy
- Security of quantum key distribution with multiphoton components
- Secure and practical multiparty quantum digital signatures
- Performance of two decoy-state quantum cryptography protocols in earth-satellite links
- Effects of depolarizing quantum channels on BB84 and SARG04 quantum cryptography protocols
- Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution for Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 04 protocol
- Practical security analysis of two-way quantum key distribution protocols based on non-orthogonal states
- Role of Bell-CHSH violation and local filtering in quantum key distribution
- Decoy States and Two Way Quantum Key Distribution Schemes
- Recent developments in quantum key distribution: theory and practice
- Security of quantum key distribution with iterative sifting
- Probing Quantum Telecloning on Superconducting Quantum Processors
- Quantum Key Distribution With several intercept-resend attacks Via A Depolarizing Channel
- Secure BB84-type quantum key distribution with simple phase error formula
- Discrete Rotational Symmetry and Quantum Key Distribution Protocols
- Reducing Network Cooling Cost Using Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution