What is "system": some decoherence-theory arguments
arXiv:quant-ph/0509214 · doi:10.1007/s10773-006-9186-0
Abstract
We discuss the possibility of making the {\it initial} definitions of mutually different (possibly interacting, or even entangled) systems in the context of decoherence theory. We point out relativity of the concept of elementary physical system as well as point out complementarity of the different possible divisions of a composite system into "subsystems", thus eventually sharpening the issue of 'what is system'.
9 pages, no figures
Cited by in corpus (18)
- A free energy principle for generic quantum systems
- What is "system": the information-theoretic arguments
- Analysis of delocalization of clusters in linear-chain -cluster states with entanglement entropy
- Building the Observer into the System: Toward a Realistic Description of Human Interaction with the World
- Quantum Correlations Relativity for Continuous Variable Systems
- Identifying quantum subsystems using Clausius' second law of thermodynamics
- Noncovariant gauge fixing in the quantum Dirac field theory of atoms and molecules
- Quantum Structures of a Model-Universe: An Inconsistency with Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Entanglement entropy and Schmidt number as measures of delocalization of clusters in one-dimensional nuclear systems
- Nothing happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation
- On dynamical stability of composite quantum particles: when entanglement is enough and when interaction is needed
- Asymptotic dynamics of the alternate degrees of freedom for a two-mode system: an analytically solvable model
- Interaction-Induced Wave Function Collapse Respects Conservation Laws
- Complete positivity on the subsystems level
- Comment on "Quantum Darwinism, Decoherence, and the Randomness of Quantum Jumps," arXiv:1412.5206
- The "Ghostly" Quantum Worlds
- Conserved Quantities and Measurements
- Effective dark energy from decoherence