Reply to Comment on ''Quantum secret sharing based on a reusable Greenberger-Horne -Zeilinger states as secure carriers''

Abstract

We show that the criticism of a recent comment \cite{ch2} on the insecurity of a quantum secret sharing protocol proposed in \cite{v2} is based on a misconception about the meaning of security and hence is invalid. The same misconception also appears in another comment of the authors \cite{ch1} on the security of an entangled-based quantum key distribution protocol \cite{zhang,v1}.

1 page, Latex, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A

References in corpus (3)

• Quantum secret sharing based on reusable GHZ states as secure carriers
• Quantum key distribution for d-level systems with generalized Bell states
• Comment on "Quantum secret sharing based on reusable Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states as secure carriers" [Phys. Rev. A 67, 044302 (2003)]

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Secure Quantum Secret Sharing Based on Reusable GHZ States as Secure Carriers
• Entanglement Split:Comment on ``Quantum secret sharing based on reusable Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states as secure carriers'' [Phys. Rev. A 67, 044302 (2003)]
• Reply to Comment on ''Quantum key distribution for d-level systems with generalized Bell states''