How the no-cloning theorem got its name
arXiv:quant-ph/0205076 · doi:10.1002/prop.200310062
Abstract
I was the referee who approved the publication of Nick Herbert's FLASH paper, knowing perfectly well that it was wrong. I explain why my decision was the correct one, and I briefly review the progress to which it led.
proceedings of Quantum Interferometry IV, needs fortschritte.sty
Cited by in corpus (18)
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Two-photon interference: the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect
- Twelve years before the quantum no-cloning theorem
- On the Phase Covariant Quantum Cloning
- An Introduction to Quantum Game Theory
- Experimental test of the no signaling theorem
- Universal and phase covariant superbroadcasting for mixed qubit states
- Entanglement, Nonlocality, Superluminal Signaling and Cloning
- A Survey of Physical Principles Attempting to Define Quantum Mechanics
- Standalone mobile quantum memory system
- No-signaling, dynamical independence, and the local observability principle
- The Quantum No-Stretching: A geometrical interpretation of the no-cloning theorem
- Popper's Experiment and Superluminal Communication
- Entanglement, intractability and no-signaling
- No-signaling, intractability and entanglement
- Non-mechanical nature of the wave function collapse
- State-Dependent Quantum Copying: an adaptive ancillary systems and its limitations
- Comment on "How the No-Cloning Theorem Got its Name"