On a Supposed Conceptual Inadequacy of the Shannon Information in Quantum Mechanics
arXiv:quant-ph/0112178
Abstract
Recently, Brukner and Zeilinger (2001) have claimed that the Shannon information is not well defined as a measure of information in quantum mechanics, adducing arguments that seek to show that it is inextricably tied to classical notions of measurement. It is shown here that these arguments do not succeed: the Shannon information does not have problematic ties to classical concepts. In a further argument, Brukner and Zeilinger compare the Shannon information unfavourably to their preferred measure, I(p), with regard to the definition of a notion of `total information content'. This argument is found unconvincing and the relationship between individual measures of information and notions of `total information content' investigated. We close by considering the prospects of Zeilinger's Foundational Principle as a foundational principle for quantum mechanics
arXiv commentPublished version, includes appendix discussing Zeilinger's Foundational Principle
References in corpus (9)
- Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)
- Operationally Invariant Information in Quantum Measurements
- Separable states are more disordered globally than locally
- Characterizing mixing and measurement in quantum mechanics
- Quantum information: How much information in a state vector?
- Invariant information and quantum state estimation
- Notes on a Paulian Idea: Foundational, Historical, Anecdotal and Forward-Looking Thoughts on the Quantum
- Comment on "Conceptual Inadequacy of Shannon Information ..." by C. Brukner and A. Zeilinger
- Quantum Measurement and Shannon Information, A Reply to M. J. W. Hall