Two theories of decoherence

Abstract

Theories of decoherence come in two flavors---Platonic and Aristotelian. Platonists grant ontological primacy to the concepts and mathematical symbols by which we describe or comprehend the physical world. Aristotelians grant it to the physical world. The significance one attaches to the phenomenon of decoherence depends on the school to which one belongs. The debate about the significance of quantum states has for the most part been carried on between Platonists and Kantians, who advocate an epistemic interpretation, with Aristotelians caught in the crossfire. For the latter, quantum states are neither states of Nature nor states of knowledge. The real issue is not the kind of reality that we should attribute to quantum states but the reality of the spatial and temporal distinctions that we make. Once this is recognized, the necessity of attributing ontological primacy to facts becomes obvious, the Platonic stance becomes inconsistent, and the Kantian point of view becomes unnecessarily restrictive and unilluminating.

12 pages, LaTeX2e

References in corpus (9)

• Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
• Decoherence, Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation (the Rough Guide)
• Quantum Foundations in the Light of Quantum Information
• Classical interventions in quantum systems. I. The measuring process
• The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Objective probabilities, quantum counterfactuals, and the ABL rule
• The world according to quantum mechanics (or, the 18 errors of Henry P. Stapp)
• Quantum mechanics and consciousness: fact and fiction
• A space for the quantum world