Are Number and Phase Complementary Observables?
arXiv:quant-ph/0105036 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/30/304
Abstract
We study various ways of characterising the quantum optical number and phase as complementary observables.
15 pages
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (22)
- An Invitation to Quantum Incompatibility
- Complementarity and Uncertainty in Mach-Zehnder Interferometry and beyond
- Approximating relational observables by absolute quantities: A quantum accuracy-size trade-off
- The norm-1-property of a quantum observable
- Implementation of a canonical phase measurement with quantum feedback
- Covariant localizations in the torus and the phase observables
- Coherent state quantization and phase operator
- The Pegg-Barnett Formalism and Covariant Phase Observables
- Action-angle coherent states for quantum systems with cylindric phase space
- The canonical phase measurement is pure
- Continuous measurements for control of superconducting quantum circuits
- Intrinsic unsharpness and approximate repeatability of quantum measurements
- Regular phase operator and SU(1,1) coherent states of the harmonic oscillator
- Three paths toward the quantum angle operator
- On measurements of the canonical phase observable
- A possible general approach regarding the conformability of angular observables with mathematical rules of quantum mechanics
- A dilemma in representing observables in quantum mechanics
- Number and phase: complementarity and joint measurement uncertainties
- Complementarity in atomic and oscillator systems
- A survey on uncertainty relations and quantum measurements
- The phase representation of covariant phase observables
- Little-used Mathematical Structures in Quantum Mechanics I. Galilei Invariance and the welcher Weg Problem