On the units of bipartite entanglement: Is sixteen ounces of entanglement always equal to one pound?
arXiv:quant-ph/0011063 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/324
Abstract
In a good physical theory dimensionless quantities such as the ratio m_p / m_e of the mass of the proton to the mass of the electron do not depend on the system of units being used. This paper demonstrates that one widely used method for defining measures of entanglement violates this principle. Specifically, in this approach dimensionless ratios E(rho) / E(sigma) of entanglement measures may depend on what state is chosen as the basic unit of entanglement. This observation leads us to suggest three novel approaches to the quantification of entanglement. These approaches lead to unit-free definitions for the entanglement of formation and the distillable entanglement, and suggest natural measures of entanglement for multipartite systems. We also show that the behaviour of one of these novel measures, the entanglement of computation, is related to some open problems in computational complexity.
6 pages
References in corpus (9)
- Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations
- Bell Inequalities and the Separability Criterion
- Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states
- Entanglement of pure states for a single copy
- Minimal conditions for local pure-state entanglement manipulation
- Irreversibility in asymptotic manipulations of entanglement
- Continuity bounds for entanglement
- Classical information and distillable entanglement
- Reversible combination of inequivalent kinds of multipartite entanglement