"Quantum mysteries for anyone," or classical verities for everyone?
arXiv:quant-ph/0007101
Abstract
Unarticulated, implicit hypotheses in Bell's analysis of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) correlations are identified and examined. These relate to the mathematical-analytical properties of random variables, the character of the relevant sample spaces and physical interpretations. We shown that continuous hidden variables are not precluded by Bell inequalities. Finally, we propose a local realistic model of optical EPRB experiments and consider its implications.
10 pages LaTeX v2: Noted additional flaw in Bell's Theorem + wordsmithing v 3: Moderate revamp with argument tuning; v4 edit + new EPR model