A Refutation of Bell's Theorem

Abstract

Bell's Theorem was developed on the basis of considerations involving a linear combination of spin correlation functions, each of which has a distinct pair of arguments. The simultaneous presence of these different pairs of arguments in the same equation can be understood in two radically different ways: either as `strongly objective,' that is, all correlation functions pertain to the same set of particle pairs, or as `weakly objective,' that is, each correlation function pertains to a different set of particle pairs. It is demonstrated that once this meaning is determined, no discrepancy appears between local realistic theories and quantum mechanics: the discrepancy in Bell's Theorem is due only to a meaningless comparison between a local realistic inequality written within the strongly objective interpretation (thus relevant to a single set of particle pairs) and a quantum mechanical prediction derived from a weakly objective interpretation (thus relevant to several different sets of particle pairs).

RevTex4, 9 pages. Extended and entirely revised version. A talk given at the Vaxjo conference, Sweden; Nov. 2000. Submited to J. Math. Phys

Cited by in corpus (8)

• A Note on Bell's Theorem Logical Consistency
• Bell's Theorem: A Critique
• Quantum Violation of Bell's Inequality: a misunderstanding based on a mathematical error of neglect
• Classical description of quantum randomness using stochastic gauge systems
• Classical counterexample to Bell's theorem
• Investigations in quantum games using EPR-type set-ups
• Inequality-free proof of Bell's theorem
• Bell's inequality and a strict assessment of the concept of ``possession''