Comment on ``Dispersion-Independent High-Visibility Quantum Interference ... "
arXiv:quant-ph/0006003 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4710
Abstract
We show in this Comment that the interpretation of experimental data as well as the theory presented in Atatüre et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 618 (2000)] are incorrect and discuss why such a scheme cannot be used to "recover" high-visibility quantum interference.
Comment on Atatüre et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 618 (2000)], 2nd revision, To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. April, (2001)
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Experimental Entanglement Concentration and Universal Bell-state Synthesizer
- Quantum interference with beamlike type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion
- Improving the capacity of quantum dense coding by weak measurement and reversal measurement
- Reliability of the beamsplitter based Bell-state measurement