Analysis and Assembling of Network Structure in Mutualistic Systems

Abstract

It has been observed that mutualistic bipartite networks have a nested structure of interactions. In addition, the degree distributions associated with the two guilds involved in such networks (e.g. plants & pollinators or plants & seed dispersers) approximately follow a truncated power law. We show that nestedness and truncated power law distributions are intimately linked, and that any biological reasons for such truncation are superimposed to finite size effects . We further explore the internal organization of bipartite networks by developing a self-organizing network model (SNM) that reproduces empirical observations of pollination systems of widely different sizes. Since the only inputs to the SNM are numbers of plant and animal species, and their interactions (i.e., no data on local abundance of the interacting species are needed), we suggest that the well-known association between species frequency of interaction and species degree is a consequence rather than a cause, of the observed network structure.

J. of. Theor. Biology, in press

References in corpus (2)

• Emergence of scaling in random networks
• Statistical mechanics of complex networks

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Why Nestedness in Mutualistic Networks?
• Nestedness in complex networks: Observation, emergence, and implications
• Breaking the spell of nestedness
• Two classes of bipartite networks: nested biological and social systems
• Scaling of nestedness in complex networks
• Understanding and characterizing nestedness in mutualistic bipartite networks
• The Evolution of Competitiveness across Economic, Innovation and Knowledge production activities
• Impact of the mesoscale structure of a bipartite ecological interaction network on its robustness through a probabilistic modeling
• Phylogenetic Proximity and Nestedness in Mutualistic Ecosystems
• Does Phylogenetic Proximity Explain Nestedness in Mutualistic Ecosystems?