A physically meaningful method for the comparison of potential energy functions
arXiv:q-bio/0504029 · doi:10.1002/jcc.20337
Abstract
In the study of the conformational behavior of complex systems, such as proteins, several related statistical measures are commonly used to compare two different potential energy functions. Among them, the Pearson's correlation coefficient r has no units and allows only semi-quantitative statements to be made. Those that do have units of energy and whose value may be compared to a physically relevant scale, such as the root mean square deviation (RMSD), the mean error of the energies (ER), the standard deviation of the error (SDER) or the mean absolute error (AER), overestimate the distance between potentials. Moreover, their precise statistical meaning is far from clear. In this article, a new measure of the distance between potential energy functions is defined which overcomes the aforementioned difficulties. In addition, its precise physical meaning is discussed, the important issue of its additivity is investigated and some possible applications are proposed. Finally, two of these applications are illustrated with practical examples: the study of the van der Waals energy, as implemented in CHARMM, in the Trp-Cage protein (PDB code 1L2Y) and the comparison of different levels of the theory in the ab initio study of the Ramachandran map of the model peptide HCO-L-Ala-NH2.
30 pages, 7 figures, LaTeX, BibTeX. v2: A misspelling in the author's name has been corrected. v3: A new application of the method has been added at the end of section 9 and minor modifications have also been made in other sections. v4: Journal reference and minor corrections added
References in corpus (4)
- How Accurate Must Potentials Be for Successful Modeling of Protein Folding?
- Robust ab initio calculation of condensed matter: transparent convergence through semicardinal multiresolution analysis
- Relevant distance between two different instances of the same potential energy in protein folding
- Do theoretical physicists care about the protein-folding problem?
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Reconstructing the free-energy landscape of Met-enkephalin using dihedral Principal Component Analysis and Well-tempered Metadynamics
- Quantum mechanical calculation of the effects of stiff and rigid constraints in the conformational equilibrium of the Alanine dipeptide
- Efficient model chemistries for peptides. I. Split-valence Gaussian basis sets and the heterolevel approximation in RHF and MP2
- Definition of Systematic, Approximately Separable and Modular Internal Coordinates (SASMIC) for macromolecular simulation
- Reducing the standard deviation in multiple-assay experiments where the variation matters but the absolute value does not
- Efficient model chemistries for peptides. II. Basis set convergence in the B3LYP method