When a mass term does not represent a mass
arXiv:physics/9807056 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/19/5/002
Abstract
The definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin 2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin 1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature.
10 pages, LaTeX, no figures, to appear in European Journal of Physics
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Hamiltonian dynamics and Noether symmetries in Extended Gravity Cosmology
- A crucial ingredient of inflation
- First-order Cosmological Perturbations Engendered by Point-like Masses
- de Sitter Relativity: a New Road to Quantum Gravity?
- Space-time Philosophy Reconstructed via Massive Nordström Scalar Gravities? Laws vs. Geometry, Conventionality, and Underdetermination
- Massive Nordström Scalar (Density) Gravities from Universal Coupling
- Higgs mechanism in the Randall-Sundrum model
- A Note on the Local Cosmological Constant and the Dark Energy Coincidence Problem