Comment on "Classical and Quantum Interaction of the Dipole"

Abstract

In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].

1 page, revtex; small changes, mainly typos, according to the published version in Phys. Rev. Lett

References in corpus (3)

• The Proof that the Standard Transformations of E and B are not the Lorentz Transformations. Clifford Algebra Formalism
• The Proof that Maxwell Equations with the 3D E and B are not Covariant upon the Lorentz Transformations but upon the Standard Transformations. The New Lorentz Invariant Field Equations
• Axiomatic geometric formulation of electromagnetism with only one axiom: the field equation for the bivector field F with an explanation of the Trouton-Noble experiment

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Test of the He-McKellar-Wilkens topological phase by atom interferometry. Part I: theoretical discussion
• Lorentz Transformations of the Electric and Magnetic Fields According to Minkowski
• Generalized Uhlenbeck-Goudsmit hypothesis 'Magnetic' S^{a} and 'Electric' Z^{a} Spins
• Comment on "Röntgen Quantum Phase Shift: A Semiclassical Local Electrodynamical Effect?''
• The Constitutive Relations and the Magnetoelectric Effect for Moving Media
• The Lorentz transformations of the vectors E, B, P, M and the external electric fields from a stationary superconducting wire with a steady current and from a stationary permanent magnet
• Electric and magnetic fields as explicitly observer dependent four-dimensional vectors and their Lorentz transformations according to Minkowski-Ivezić
• The manifestly covariant Aharonov-Bohm effect in terms of the 4D fields