Phase coexistence in a forecasting game
arXiv:physics/0506151 · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P03013
Abstract
Individual choices are either based on personal experience or on information provided by peers. The latter case, causes individuals to conform to the majority in their neighborhood. Such herding behavior may be very efficient in aggregating disperse private information, thereby revealing the optimal choice. However if the majority relies on herding, this mechanism may dramatically fail to aggregate correctly the information, causing the majority adopting the wrong choice. We address these issues in a simple model of interacting agents who aim at giving a correct forecast of a public variable, either seeking private information or resorting to herding. As the fraction of herders increases, the model features a phase transition beyond which a state where most agents make the correct forecast coexists with one where most of them are wrong. Simple strategic considerations suggest that indeed such a system of agents self-organizes deep in the coexistence region. There, agents tend to agree much more among themselves than with what they aim at forecasting, as found in recent empirical studies.
4 pages 3 figures
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (20)
- Crises and collective socio-economic phenomena: simple models and challenges
- Emergence of large cliques in random scale-free network
- A two-layer model for coevolving opinion dynamics and collective decision-making in complex social systems
- Phase transition and information cascade in a voting model
- Digital herders and phase transition in a voting model
- Phase transition to two-peaks phase in an information cascade voting experiment
- Information cascade, Kirman's ant colony model, and kinetic Ising model
- Role of the plurality rule in multiple choices
- Correlation function for generalized Pólya urns: Finite-size scaling analysis
- Two kinds of Phase transitions in a Voting model
- Emergence of collective memories
- Information cascade on networks
- What do leaders know?
- Local interaction scale controls the existence of a non-trivial optimal critical mass in opinion spreading
- Collective Adoption of Max-Min Strategy in an Information Cascade Voting Experiment
- Dynamic scaling regimes of collective decision making
- Emerging interdependence between stock values during financial crashes
- Quantum statistics and networks by asymmetric preferential attachment of nodes -- between bosons and fermions
- Collective decision making with a mix of majority and minority seekers
- Stochastic analysis of an agent-based model