Connecting the X(5)-, X(5)-, and X(3) models to the shape/phase transition region of the interacting boson model
arXiv:nucl-th/0607048 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034306
Abstract
The parameter independent (up to overall scale factors) predictions of the X(5)-, X(5)-, and X(3) models, which are variants of the X(5) critical point symmetry developed within the framework of the geometric collective model, are compared to two-parameter calculations in the framework of the interacting boson approximation (IBA) model. The results show that these geometric models coincide with IBA parameters consistent with the phase/shape transition region of the IBA for boson numbers of physical interest (close to 10). Nuclei within the rare-earth region and select Os and Pt isotopes are identified as good examples of X(3), X(5)-, and X(5)- behavior.
References in corpus (14)
- Z(5): Critical point symmetry for the prolate to oblate nuclear shape phase transition
- X(3): An Exactly Separable Gamma-Rigid Version of the X(5) Critical Point Symmetry
- A computationally tractable version of the collective model
- Effects of beta-gamma coupling in transitional nuclei and the validity of the approximate separation of variables
- Gamma-rigid solution of the Bohr Hamiltonian for gamma = 30 degrees compared to the E(5) critical point symmetry
- Sequence of Potentials Lying Between the U(5) and X(5) Symmetries
- Sequence of Potentials Interpolating between the U(5) and E(5) Symmetries
- The U(5)-O(6) transition in the Interacting Boson Model and the E(5) critical point symmetry
- Phase structure of a two-fluid bosonic system
- Phase structure of the two-fluid proton-neutron system
- Singular Character of Critical Points in Nuclei
- Consequences of wall stiffness for a beta-soft potential
- Phase Diagram of the Proton-Neutron Interacting Boson Model
- The potential at the U(5)-O(6) critical point of the Interacting Boson Model