The shape of incomplete preferences

Abstract

Incomplete preferences provide the epistemic foundation for models of imprecise subjective probabilities and utilities that are used in robust Bayesian analysis and in theories of bounded rationality. This paper presents a simple axiomatization of incomplete preferences and characterizes the shape of their representing sets of probabilities and utilities. Deletion of the completeness assumption from the axiom system of Anscombe and Aumann yields preferences represented by a convex set of state-dependent expected utilities, of which at least one must be a probability/utility pair. A strengthening of the state-independence axiom is needed to obtain a representation purely in terms of a set of probability/utility pairs.

arXiv commentPublished at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000740 in the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Desirability and the birth of incomplete preferences
• Robust decision analysis under severe uncertainty and ambiguous tradeoffs: an invasive species case study
• Certainty Equivalent and Utility Indifference Pricing for Incomplete Preferences via Convex Vector Optimization
• Choice functions based on sets of strict partial orders: an axiomatic characterisation