Chang's conjecture may fail at supercompact cardinals (submitted)
arXiv:math/0605128
Abstract
We prove a revised version of Laver's indestructibility theorem which slightly improves over the classical result. An application yields the consistency of $(κ^+,κ)\notcc(\aleph\_1,\aleph\_0)$ when is supercompact. The actual proofs show that -regressive Kurepa-trees are consistent above a supercompact cardinal even though destroys them on all regular cardinals. This rather paradoxical fact contradicts the common intuition.