Set mapping reflection
arXiv:math/0501526 · doi:10.1142/S0219061305000407
Abstract
In this note we will discuss a new reflection principle which follows from the Proper Forcing Axiom. The immediate purpose will be to prove that the bounded form of the Proper Forcing Axiom implies both that 2^omega = omega_2 and that L(P(omega_1)) satisfies the Axiom of Choice. It will also be demonstrated that this reflection principle implies that combinatorial principle Square(kappa) fails for all regular kappa > omega_1.
11 pages
Cited by in corpus (14)
- A five element basis for the uncountable linear orders
- Weak diamond and Galvin's property
- The Proper Forcing Axiom, Prikry forcing, and the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis
- Dependent Choice, Properness, and Generic Absoluteness
- Chang's Conjecture, The Weak Reflection Principle and the Tree Property at
- What model companionship can say about the Continuum problem
- NS saturated and -definable
- Definable MAD families and forcing axioms
- Bounded forcing axioms and Baumgartner's conjecture
- Forcing Axioms and the Definabilty of the Nonstationary Ideal on
- Absolute model companionship, forcibility, and the continuum problem
- The model-companionship spectrum of set theory, generic absoluteness, and the Continuum problem
- Bounded Martin's Maximum with Many Witnesses
- The Stationary Set Splitting Game