The Difference between Abelian and Non-Abelian Models: Fact and Fancy

Abstract

The commonly accepted belief that non-Abelian and Abelian models are different because of the presence/absence of instantons and/or perturbative asymptotic freedom is analyzed from a historical perspective. The presentation covers the major developments which brought about this dogma, as well as all the supportive evidence produced since. For a model possessing both asymptotic freedom and instantons it is shown rigorously that a disorder variable varies nonanalytically with the temperature.

20 pages, no figures. This paper reflects the state of affairs as it was in 1991. In some areas there have been important developments since then

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Provable first-order transitions for liquid crystal and lattice gauge models with continuous symmetries
• Off-Shell Dynamics of the O(3) Nonlinear Sigma-Model -- Beyond Monte-Carlo and Perturbation Theory
• Super-Instantons and the Reliability of Perturbation Theory in Non-Abelian Models
• Pathologies of the large-N limit for RP^{N-1}, CP^{N-1}, QP^{N-1} and mixed isovector/isotensor sigma-models
• Lattice Perturbation Theory for $O(N)$-Symmetric $\sigma$-Models with General Nearest-Neighbour Action I. Conventional Perturbation Theory
• Is the 2D O(3) Nonlinear $\sigma$ Model Asymptotically Free?
• The Perturbative Method Fails in Non-Abelian Models
• Finite size induced phenomena in 2D classical spin models