What's Wrong with Pauli-Villars Regularization in $QE{D}_3$ ?

Abstract

In this letter we argue that there is no ambiguity between the Pauli-Villars and other methods of regularization in (2+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics with respect to dynamical mass generation, provided we properly choose the couplings for the regulators.

07 pages, Latex, no figures

Cited by in corpus (12)

• Normalizability analysis of the generalized quantum electrodynamics from the causal point of view
• No parity anomaly in massless QED3: a BPHZL approach
• The ultraviolet and infrared perturbative finiteness of massless QED${}_3$
• Lorentz-violating effects in three-dimensional $QED$
• The quantum scale invariance in graphene-like quantum electrodynamics
• Propagating Torsion in 3D-Gravity and Dynamical Mass Generation
• Gauged Thirring Model in the Heisenberg Picture
• The parity-preserving massive QED3: vanishing beta-function and no parity anomaly
• Källén-Lehmann representation of noncommutative quantum electrodynamics
• Quantum Field Theory in fractal space-time with negative Hausdorff-Colombeau dimensions.The solution cosmological constant problem
• Dynamical mass generation in QED${}_3$: A non-perturbative approach
• On the ultraviolet finiteness of parity-preserving $U(1)\times U(1)$ massive QED${}_3$