Non-renormalizable terms and M theory during inflation

Abstract

Inflation is well known to be difficult in the context of supergravity, if the potential is dominated by the $F$ term. Non-renormalizable terms generically give $|V^{\prime \prime }|\sim V/M^2$, where $V(\varphi )$ is the inflaton potential and $M$ is the scale above which the effective field theory under consideration is supposed to break down. This is equivalent to $|η|\sim (\mpl/M)^2 > 1$ where $\mpl=(8πG)^{-1/2}$, but inflation requires $|\eta |<0.1$. I here point out that all of the above applies also if the $D$ term dominates, with the crucial difference that the generic result is now easily avoided by imposing a discrete symmetry. I also point out that if extra spacetime dimensions appear well below the Planck scale, as in a recent M-theory model, one expects $M\ll \mpl$, which makes the problem worse than if $M\sim \mpl$.

9 pages latex. Significant change flagged by 3rd footnote

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Particle Physics Models of Inflation and the Cosmological Density Perturbation
• Hilltop Inflation
• Inflation models and observation
• More hilltop inflation models
• Supersymmetric D-term Inflation, Reheating and Affleck-Dine Baryogenesis
• Particle physics models of inflation
• Inflationary Affleck-Dine Scalar Dynamics and Isocurvature Perturbations
• D-term chaotic inflation in supergravity
• The masses of weakly-coupled scalar fields in the early Universe
• Reheating and gravitino production in braneworld inflation
• Super Hilltop Inflation
• Supersymmetric D-term Inflation and B-ball Baryogenesis
• Inflationary Reheating in Grand Unified Theories
• Constraining Modular Inflation in the MSSM from Giant Q-Ball Formation
• Right-Handed Sneutrino Curvaton and non-Gaussianity