Comment on "Hara's theorem in the constituent quark model"

Abstract

It is pointed out that current conservation alone does not suffice to prove Hara's theorem as it was claimed recently. By explicit calculation we show that the additional implicit assumption made in such "proofs" is that of a sufficiently localized current.

8 pages, Latex

References in corpus (1)

• Hara's Theorem and W-exchange in Hyperon Weak Radiative Decays

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Reply to Comment on "Hara's theorem in the constituent quark model"