The Light Gluino Mass Window Revisited
arXiv:hep-ph/0302076 · doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00539-2
Abstract
The precise measurements of the ``electroweak observables'' performed at LEP and SLC are well consistent with the standard model predictions. Deviations from the standard model arising from vacuum polarization diagrams (also called ``weak loop corrections'') have been constrained in a model-independent manner with the epsilon formalism. Within the same formalism, additional deviations from new physics production processes can also be constrained, still in a model-independent way. For instance, a 95% C.L. limit of Delta Gamma_had} < 3.9 MeV is set on the partial width of any purely hadronic exotic contribution to Z decays. When applied to the e+e- -> q qbar gluino gluino process, it allows an absolute lower limit to be set on the gluino mass, m_gluino > 6.3 GeV/c2 at 95% C.L., which definitely closes the so-called light gluino mass window.
Slightly revised version (new references, cosmetic changes, ...) after Phys. Lett. refereeing Accepted by Phys. Lett
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Supersymmetric Unification Without Low Energy Supersymmetry And Signatures for Fine-Tuning at the LHC
- Stable Massive Particles at Colliders
- Mass Bounds on a Very Light Neutralino
- Constraining Light Colored Particles with Event Shapes
- Search for stable hadronizing squarks and gluinos in e+e- collisions up to sqrt(s) = 209 GeV
- Closing the light sbottom mass window from a compilation of e+e- -> hadron data
- Same-Sign Charginos and Majorana Neutralinos at the LHC
- Spin Asymmetries in Squark and Gluino Production at Polarized Hadron Colliders
- Light Gluino Constituents of Hadrons and a Global Analysis of Hadron Scattering Data
- New Light Windows for Sparticle Masses and Higgs Decays in the R Parity Violating MSSM
- Squark Mixing in Electron-Positron Reactions
- Stop and sbottom searches at LEP
- Impact of CP phases on a light sbottom and gluino sector
- The Mysteries of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays
- Can there be a heavy sbottom hidden in three-jet data at LEP?