paper

Comment on: Neutrino Mass Anarchy

arXiv:hep-ph/0102102

Abstract

Recently Hall, Murayama and Weiner (Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2572, [hep-ph/9911341]) claimed that neutrino oscillation data are well accounted for by a neutrino mass matrix which appears to have random entries. Here this claim is disputed by constructing a specific counter example. Structure in the neutrino mass matrix is clearly preferred over random matrices.

Latex, 1 page, no figures

Comment on: Neutrino Mass Anarchy · wovepaper